How to Stop Hoping your Adult Child will Change….

And start protecting yourself. By Steve Phillips-Waller

Living with the heartbreak of a troubled relationship with your adult child requires a kind of courage most people never have to find. You wake up each day carrying the weight of worry, the ache of disappointment, and the exhausting burden of trying to fix something that remains broken despite your best efforts.

Perhaps you’ve spent years—maybe decades—pouring yourself into this relationship, believing that your next attempt, your next conversation, your next gesture of help would finally be the one that turns everything around.

You likely carry guilt and blame, too. Perhaps you mentally catalogue every parenting decision and wonder which ones led here. Yet theories from psychologists like Judith Rich Harris and Howard Gardner point to something both challenging and freeing: peer groups, individual temperament, and experiences beyond your home shaped your child in ways you might not realize.

Mental health issues, addiction, toxic partners, and traumatic experiences you couldn’t have prevented all play roles in who your child has become. There’s no question that you greatly influenced them, but you didn’t determine everything.

The truth many parents eventually face is that protecting yourself doesn’t mean you’ve failed or stopped caring. Sometimes, the most profound act of love involves stepping back, setting firm boundaries, and choosing your own wellbeing even when it feels impossible. Here’s how.

1. Recognize when you’re stuck in the “hope trap”.

Your mind keeps returning to the same script. Maybe next month will be different. Maybe once they get through this rough patch. Maybe after they turn thirty, or forty, or after they hit rock bottom. You find yourself making excuses that sound reasonable in the moment—they’re under stress, they didn’t mean it that way, they’re trying their best.

Perpetual hoping feels productive because it keeps you engaged. Your brain searches desperately for patterns that suggest improvement, latching onto small moments of kindness or brief periods of stability as evidence that real change is coming. Meanwhile, you’re waiting for apologies that never arrive, or arrive without the behavioral shifts that should follow them.

What makes this trap so powerful is the gap between who you remember raising and who stands before you now. That cognitive dissonance—the clash between the child you knew and the adult they’ve become—keeps you stuck in the past, constantly seeing potential instead of accepting reality.

Hope becomes toxic when it stops you from taking the necessary action to protect yourself. You deserve to acknowledge that hoping without evidence of change, year after year, creates its own kind of suffering. Parents often stay trapped here because admitting your child might not change feels like giving up on them, when really you’re just beginning to face what is rather than what you wish could be.

2. Understand that your love alone can’t fix them.

Many parents carry a deeply rooted belief that love conquers all. You’ve loved this person from before they took their first breath, through every scraped knee and bad dream and teenage crisis. Surely that same love can pull them through whatever they’re facing now.

But adult children struggling with addiction, personality disorders, mental illness, or deeply ingrained behavioral patterns need professional intervention that you simply cannot provide, no matter how much you love them. Your role as a parent has inherent limitations once someone reaches adulthood. You can offer support, but you cannot force someone into their own healing journey.

Here’s where many parents stumble into codependency without realizing it. When helping becomes rescuing—when you’re working harder on their life than they are—you’re actually removing the natural discomfort that might motivate them to seek real help. Taking responsibility for their healing disempowers them, sending the unintended message that they’re not capable of managing their own life.

Supporting someone means standing beside them as they do their own work. Rescuing means doing the work for them. One builds strength; the other prevents it. Learning this distinction doesn’t mean you love them less. Sometimes, loving wisely means stepping back so that they have the space to find their own way forward, even if that path includes struggles you desperately wish you could spare them.

3. Accept that setting boundaries isn’t abandonment.

Guilt rises in your throat every time you consider saying no. The voice in your head sounds relentless: “I’m their parent, I should always be there.” Friends and family might reinforce this, questioning how you could possibly set limits with your own child. Cultural or religious teachings may have emphasized that parents never give up, never stop giving, never close the door.

Yet boundaries and abandonment are fundamentally different. Abandonment means disappearing without explanation or care. Boundaries mean clearly communicating what you will and won’t accept while still caring about the person. Setting a boundary with your adult child actually creates healthy structure in a relationship where chaos has taken over.

Sometimes, boundaries become the only real consequence a person faces, and consequences are powerful teachers. However, you need to set boundaries primarily to protect yourself, not as a strategy to change them. Change might happen, but it cannot be your goal, or you’ll end up disappointed and resentful.

Consider the difference between a boundary and an ultimatum. “I won’t give you money anymore” is a boundary—a decision about your own behavior. “Stop drinking or I’ll never speak to you again” is an ultimatum—an attempt to control their behavior through threats.

Boundaries focus on what you can control: your own actions, your own space, your own resources. They don’t require the other person to change, only that you follow through on what you’ve said you’ll do. Your child is an adult now. Treating them as such, complete with natural consequences for their choices, is more respectful than continuing to shield them from reality indefinitely.

4. Grieve the child you thought you’d have.

Nobody talks about this part enough. You’re mourning someone who is still alive, which feels confusing and somehow wrong. People offer platitudes: “At least they’re still here,” or “Things could be worse.” But the grief is real, and it deserves acknowledgment.

You imagined a different future. Perhaps you pictured holiday dinners where everyone actually wanted to be there, or Sunday phone calls filled with genuine connection rather than crisis management. Maybe you dreamed of being the kind of grandparent who gets regular visits, or having an adult friendship with your child where you truly enjoy each other’s company.

Some parents experience anticipatory grief when the relationship exists but feels effectively over. You’re preparing for permanent loss even though they’re physically present. Others grieve the thousand small losses: the family photos they’re not in, the celebrations they’ve ruined, the trust that’s been shattered beyond repair.

Unprocessed grief often keeps you stuck in hope because grieving feels like finalizing something you’re not ready to finalize. Yet allowing yourself to feel this sadness doesn’t mean you’re giving up. Grief and love coexist. You can mourn what never was and what will never be while still caring about them. You can feel genuine sadness about the relationship you don’t have while also accepting reality. Even if others don’t understand this particular kind of loss, it’s legitimate. Give yourself permission to feel it fully.

5. Identify the specific behaviours you can no longer tolerate.

Vague boundaries like “be respectful” or “treat me better” leave too much room for interpretation. You need concrete, specific lines that both you and your child clearly understand. Grab a piece of paper. Write down the behaviors that have become unacceptable—not occasional mistakes everyone makes, but patterns that repeat despite your best efforts.

Your list might include things like verbal abuse during conversations, showing up at your home uninvited, stealing from you or other family members, creating scenes at family gatherings, using your grandchildren as bargaining chips, asking for money and then spending it on substances, violating your privacy by going through your things, or being intoxicated when they’re in your space. Each person’s list looks different because each situation is unique.

Now rewrite each item as a specific boundary with a clear consequence. “If you raise your voice or call me names, I will end the conversation immediately” is actionable. “Don’t disrespect me” is not. “You may not come to family events if you’re under the influence; if you arrive intoxicated, you’ll be asked to leave” is clear. “Behave at holidays” is not.

Distinguishing between supporting someone through genuinely hard times and accepting unacceptable treatment matters here. Supporting might mean listening to them vent about job frustrations. Accepting unacceptable treatment means letting them scream at you about those frustrations as if you caused them. Supporting might mean helping them research treatment options. Accepting unacceptable treatment means funding their lifestyle while they refuse treatment. You can care deeply about someone’s wellbeing while refusing to tolerate harmful behavior directed at you.

6. Recognize your own enabling patterns.

Enabling means removing natural consequences or making it easier for someone to continue self-destructive patterns. Parents enable from a place of love, which makes it incredibly hard to see clearly. You’re not trying to harm them—you’re trying desperately to help. But certain kinds of help function as obstacles.

Enabling might look like repeatedly covering rent when they spend their money elsewhere, providing housing without any expectations or boundaries, lying to other family members to protect their reputation, accepting blame for choices they made as adults, bailing them out of legal or financial troubles they created, or doing things for them that they’re fully capable of doing themselves. You might make excuses to employers, smooth things over with people they’ve wronged, or sacrifice your own needs to meet their endless demands.

Parents enable for complicated reasons. Guilt whispers that you owe them, that their struggles are somehow your fault. Fear suggests that if you don’t help, something terrible will happen and you’ll be responsible. Habit means you’ve been fixing their problems for so long that it feels normal. Love makes you want to ease their suffering by any means possible. Hope tells you that this time, this help will be the one that finally turns things around.

Ask yourself hard questions. Does my help actually improve their situation in the long run, or does it just delay consequences? Am I doing this to ease my own anxiety rather than truly benefit them? Would I offer this same help to a friend’s adult child in identical circumstances, or am I applying different standards because this is my child? Sometimes, the most loving thing you can do is step back and let natural consequences teach lessons you cannot.

7. Detach with love: the practice of emotional distance.

Caring about someone while refusing to be consumed by their chaos sounds impossible until you learn how. Emotional detachment doesn’t mean you stop loving them or stop hoping they find peace. Rather, you stop letting their crisis become your crisis, their emergency become your emergency, or their choices determine your emotional state.

Practical detachment looks like not answering the phone every single time they call, especially when those calls follow a predictable pattern of drama or demands. Allow silence to exist instead of filling every quiet moment with worry about them. Observe their life without trying to direct, manage, or control it. Respond to situations thoughtfully rather than reacting from panic or guilt.

People sometimes confuse detachment with cold indifference—cutting someone off emotionally and not caring what happens to them. Warm detachment is different. You genuinely wish them well. You care about their wellbeing. You would celebrate if their life improved. But you’re no longer entangled in the daily ups and downs. You’re no longer losing sleep over decisions they’re making. You’re no longer organizing your life around their next crisis.

Anxiety will rise when you first practice detachment because taking action feels safer than accepting powerlessness. Your mind will insist that if you just worry hard enough, think long enough, or intervene quickly enough, you can prevent disaster.

Learning to sit with that anxiety—to feel it without acting on it—takes practice. Breathing exercises help. So does reminding yourself that you cannot control another adult’s life, and attempting to do so exhausts you without helping them. Detachment is a skill that strengthens with repetition, and it might just save your health and sanity.

8. Create and enforce consequences (not punishments).

Consequences and punishments sound similar but function very differently. A consequence is a natural outcome you calmly follow through on to protect yourself or maintain your boundaries. A punishment is a retaliatory action designed to cause pain or teach a lesson through suffering.

“If you come to my home intoxicated, I’ll ask you to leave” is a consequence. You’re protecting your space and maintaining your boundary, stated clearly and enforced without anger. “I won’t talk to you for a month to teach you a lesson about drinking” is a punishment. You’re using your relationship as leverage to control their behavior, and there’s anger or vindictiveness behind it.

Consequences focus on your needs and limits. Punishments focus on forcing them to change. Consequences can be enforced consistently because they’re about protecting yourself, not about your emotional state toward them. Punishments tend to crumble because they require you to maintain anger or disappointment, which is exhausting.

Enforcement is where most boundaries fall apart. You state a boundary clearly, then the moment comes to follow through, and guilt floods in. Maybe they’re crying. Maybe they’re angry. Maybe you’re worried about what will happen if you actually enforce this limit. But backing down teaches them that your boundaries are negotiable, that if they push hard enough or make you feel guilty enough, you’ll fold. Your credibility—both with them and with yourself—depends on following through.

You might say something like: “I need you to leave now. You can call me tomorrow when you’re sober and we can talk then.” Keep your voice calm and your explanation brief. You’re not debating, defending, or discussing in the moment. The discomfort you feel during enforcement is real, but it’s temporary. The erosion of your self-respect from repeatedly failing to enforce your own boundaries lasts much longer.

9. Stop the mental rumination and “what if” thinking.

Your mind probably goes over your situation a LOT. You replay the last conversation, analyzing every word for clues about what you should have said differently. You imagine scenarios—what if you’d been stricter when they were young, what if you’d chosen a different school, what if you’d seen the warning signs earlier. You lie awake at three in the morning constructing elaborate fantasies about reconciliation, picturing the exact words that would finally break through to them.

Rumination feels productive because you’re doing something, even if that something is just thinking in circles. Your brain tricks you into believing that if you just analyze hard enough, replay the past thoroughly enough, or imagine the future vividly enough, you’ll discover the solution that’s been hiding all along. But rumination doesn’t produce solutions. It produces exhaustion.

The psychological trap works because thinking creates a false sense of control. You can’t control their choices or fix their problems, but you can control your thoughts—except you can’t, really, because rumination is compulsive. You’re not choosing these thought patterns; they’re choosing you, particularly during vulnerable moments like early morning or late at night when your defenses are down.

Interrupting rumination requires deliberate techniques. When you notice yourself spiraling, say “stop” out loud if you can, or imagine a stop sign in your mind. Engage your body through movement—go for a walk, do ten jumping jacks, wash dishes with full attention to the sensation of warm water.

Schedule specific “worry time” where you allow yourself fifteen minutes to think about your child, then practice redirecting your thoughts when that time ends. Mindfulness practices help by training your attention to return to the present moment rather than dwelling in the past or future.

Physical activity particularly helps because it’s nearly impossible to ruminate deeply while your body is engaged in something demanding. Your mental energy needs somewhere to go, and if you don’t direct it toward your own life, it will continue flowing toward theirs. Healing requires reclaiming that energy and investing it in things you can actually influence.

10. Know when to cut contact (and when not to).

Complete estrangement isn’t necessary in every difficult relationship, though sometimes, it becomes the only viable option for protecting your wellbeing. Many relationships exist somewhere along a spectrum between full contact and no contact, and finding the right point on that spectrum for your situation matters.

Low contact with strict boundaries might mean you talk once a month on the phone but don’t see each other in person. Modified contact could involve only meeting in public places, or only communicating through text, where you have time to consider your responses. Maintained contact with emotional detachment means you interact but practice the kind of warm detachment we discussed earlier—present but not consumed.

Some of the signs that no contact might be necessary include ongoing abuse that doesn’t stop despite clear boundaries, threats to your safety or the safety of others, dangerous behaviour that puts you at risk, or such severe impact on your physical or mental health that staying in contact is causing you serious harm.

Some parents reach a point where every interaction leaves them shaking, unable to eat, or spiraling into depression for days afterward. Your body often knows before your mind fully accepts that continuing contact is unsustainable.

Is no contact forever? Maybe, maybe not. Committing to permanent estrangement can feel overwhelming, so instead, consider it a decision for right now. You can be firmly no contact today while remaining open to the possibility that circumstances might change years from now. Flexibility doesn’t mean weakness. Changing your mind based on actual evidence of sustained change is a reasonable choice you might make.

Implementing no contact involves blocking phone numbers if necessary, restricting or blocking on social media, asking family members not to share information about you, and possibly using lawyers or mediators for any necessary communication about practical matters.

Grandchildren complicate everything. Some parents maintain minimal contact solely for the sake of relationships with grandchildren, accepting very firm boundaries about what that contact looks like. Others find that the toll of interacting with their adult child makes even that impossible. There’s no right answer that works for everyone.

11. Practice self-compassion through this painful journey.

You’ve been harder on yourself through this process than you’d ever be on someone you love. Every boundary you set comes with a wave of guilt. Every conversation that goes badly gets replayed with harsh internal commentary about what you did wrong. You blame yourself for things that happened twenty years ago, for decisions you made with the information you had at the time, for being human and imperfect.

Self-compassion means speaking to yourself the way you’d speak to a dear friend going through this exact situation. Would you tell your best friend that they’re a terrible person for setting boundaries with an abusive adult child? Would you blame them for their child’s addiction or mental illness? Would you expect them to tolerate treatment you wouldn’t accept from anyone else? The kindness you extend to others needs to flow toward yourself, too.

Acknowledge out loud that this is genuinely difficult. You’re navigating something that most people don’t understand and doing your best with limited options, all while carrying grief and worry and confusion.

Perfect boundary-setting doesn’t exist. You’ll probably slip up, give in when you said you wouldn’t, say yes when you meant to say no. Forgive yourself for past enabling, for all the times you rescued when you should have stepped back, for the mistakes you’ve made along the way and will make in the future.

Parents who’ve spent decades putting everyone else first often find self-compassion particularly challenging. You’ve been trained—by culture, by habit, by your own values—to sacrifice yourself for your children. Relearning that your wellbeing matters, that protecting yourself isn’t selfish, and that you deserve peace even if that peace comes at the cost of distance from your child—this feels wrong and necessary all at once.

Daily practices help. Journal about your feelings without judgment. Write affirmations that counter the harsh thoughts: “I’m doing my best in an impossible situation.” “I deserve safety and peace.” “Protecting myself doesn’t mean I’ve stopped loving them.” Definitely consider getting some therapy with someone experienced in family dynamics—this can provide crucial support and guidance for your very specific situation.

Simple acknowledgment of your pain matters, too. You might tell yourself: “This hurts. This is really, really hard. I’m allowed to feel this.” Self-compassion forms the foundation of sustainable boundary-setting because you cannot maintain boundaries while constantly beating yourself up for having them.

You deserve to live without constant chaos, to sleep through the night, to enjoy moments without guilt. Peace is possible even if the relationship never becomes what you hoped. Your life has value independent of whether your child changes. Hold onto that truth, especially on the hardest days.

You Don’t Need Permission To Protect Yourself

You’ve been seeking permission—from someone, from somewhere—to finally put yourself first. Here’s what needs saying: You are allowed to step back. You are allowed to prioritize your own mental and physical health. You are allowed to build a life that isn’t organized around crisis management and worry.

Choosing yourself doesn’t erase your love or your history or your connection to this person who will always be your child in some fundamental way. But you cannot pour endlessly from an empty cup, and you’ve been running on fumes for far too long. The relationship you have is the relationship you have, not the one you wish existed.

Change might come someday. Then again, it might not. Either way, your life continues. You get to decide how to spend your energy, where to direct your care, what you will and won’t accept. You get to build boundaries that protect you and maintain whatever form of connection feels sustainable, even if that means no connection at all for a while.

Every parent who has walked this path has felt the same guilt, the same fear, the same heartbreak you’re feeling. You’re not alone in this, even when it feels desperately lonely. Somewhere tonight, another parent is making these same painful choices, learning these same difficult lessons.

Your worth isn’t measured by whether you can fix someone else. You’ve done enough. You’ve given enough. Now it’s time to offer yourself the same compassion you’ve extended to them for so long.

Conscious Re-Think

The Cultural Story Behind Family Estrangement

by Rachel Haack MA MFTI

1. Postmodernism and Critical Theory in the Family System

Postmodernism taught us to question authority and dismantle universal truths. Critical theory taught us to look for oppression and power in every relationship. Both were useful lenses at first, until they became the only lenses.

Today, these frameworks have trickled all the way down into the family, where dynamics are no longer just relational but political.
Parents are recast as oppressors. Children as liberators. Love becomes suspect, and forgiveness looks like betrayal of the self.

Books like Adult Children of Emotionally Immature Parents and online influencers preaching “go no contact” have popularized this moral framework of hierarchy and harm. Once you interpret ordinary imperfection through a lens of oppression, the only moral response becomes disconnection.

2. Social Contagion and the Amplification of Ideas

Before smartphones, ideas spread through communities slowly: by conversation, print, and lived experience. Now they spread virally, without friction or context.

We’ve seen social contagions before: diagnostic trends like “multiple personality disorder” in the 1980s or the surge of “recovered memories.” Today, similar dynamics are playing out around “toxic parents,” “narcissistic mothers,” and “cutoff as healing.”

On TikTok and Instagram, creators share stories of liberation from their families, often rewarded with validation and applause. The more sensational the story, the more viral it becomes. And soon, estrangement itself, especially “no contact”, becomes not just a coping choice but a cultural script.

3. The Portable, Always-Connected World

In 1960, a college student might have called home once a month (collect!).
Letters were the norm. Distance was assumed. Love wasn’t measured in response time.

Now, the digital tether has changed our expectations entirely. Parents and adult children can be in contact multiple times a day, and when they’re not, it feels like something’s wrong.

This 24/7 accessibility has raised the relational temperature for everyone. We’re over-connected, overstimulated, and overwhelmed. Most adults are managing hundreds of micro-relationships through text, email, and social media. The guilt of not keeping up, of failing to “stay in touch”, becomes exhausting. And sometimes, that guilt turns into avoidance or conflict.

We’re living in what I call the age of too much para-connection, where everyone feels both crowded and lonely.

4. Concept Creep, Safetyism, and the Pathologizing of Discomfort

Over the past decade, psychological language has exploded into everyday conversation. Words that once had clinical meaning: trauma, abuse, narcissism, gaslighting, boundaries – are now used casually to describe any form of emotional pain or frustration. Psychologists Nick Haslam and Jonathan Haidt have called this phenomenon concept creep: when the definitions of harm and trauma expand to include ordinary stress, discomfort, and disagreement.

At the same time, a new cultural ideal has emerged, what Haidt and Greg Lukianoff call safetyism. Safety, once meaning freedom from physical danger, now includes freedom from emotional discomfort. To be “safe” means to never feel hurt, anxious, or misunderstood.

This shift sounds compassionate, but it has quietly redefined what we consider harmful. Normal friction in relationships: differences in temperament, misunderstanding, conflict, even the enduring “perpetual problems” that exist in every long-term bond – are now reinterpreted as forms of emotional danger.

When discomfort itself is seen as harm, repair begins to look like self-betrayal. Rather than learning tolerance for relational tension, we pathologize it. And soon, the ordinary pain of loving another imperfect human being starts to feel like something we must protect ourselves from, rather than something we can grow through.

5. The Reinforcement Loop: How Therapy Culture Confirms the Cutoff

This new sensitivity to harm is reinforced by the professionals and influencers shaping our public conversations about relationships. The dominant narrative says that no one cuts off contact with a parent without perfectly good reasons. The logic goes like this: because estrangement feels so unthinkable, it must also be justified.

Therapists and creators often tell their audiences, “You’ve done everything you could,” or “No one goes no contact lightly.” The implicit message is that disconnection is the only rational or healthy conclusion to a long-standing relationship problem.

In clinical spaces, this message is amplified by a moral pressure that runs deep in the helping professions. To challenge a client’s decision to cut off contact is framed as “causing harm.” To explore reconciliation is seen as enabling abuse. Therapists are warned that if we don’t affirm a client’s self-protective decisions, we risk becoming “excusers of abusers.” I receive messages such as “Yikes. This is dangerous.” to an instagram post addressing the nuance of estrangement.

Naturally, that strikes fear into the heart of any well-meaning clinician who wants to do right by their client. To imagine that our empathy could itself cause harm is paralyzing. And so, out of caution, many practitioners stop short of exploring repair or differentiation, even when disconnection may be premature or unnecessary.

What results is a therapeutic culture that affirms estrangement as inherently empowering: but rarely asks whether empowerment might also come from growth, dialogue, or courage in the face of discomfort.

6. The “Pure Relationship” and the Consumer Self

Sociologist Anthony Giddens coined the term the pure relationship—the belief that a relationship’s legitimacy depends on emotional satisfaction alone. It should be warm, mutually beneficial, and affirming at all times.

That idea, combined with our culture’s obsession with optimization, has quietly reshaped our relational ethics. We now evaluate our relationships the way we evaluate products: Does this still serve me? Does this make me happy?

When something feels hard, the impulse isn’t to repair, it’s to replace.
We live in a hyper-individualistic, portable, meritocratic, consumer world. We can move cities, change jobs, and find new communities with a swipe. The result is a growing inability to tolerate the inevitable discomforts of enduring relationships: the very tensions that make us grow up, soften, and mature. We don’t have to learn to live within our village: we can find a new one instead.

Estrangement, in this context, isn’t just a breakdown of love; it’s the logical conclusion of a culture that has made comfort and self-expression the highest virtues.

7. Luxury Beliefs and the New Village of One

Sociologist Rob Henderson coined the term luxury beliefs to describe ideas that signal social status but often carry hidden costs for others. In this context, the belief that cutting off “toxic” family members is always healthy functions like a luxury belief: it’s most easily embraced by those who can afford to lose their families and replace them (often with paid support networks).

Many modern cutoffs occur in families with greater resources, where autonomy is financially feasible. Our standard of living has made it possible to outsource almost every form of relational interdependence. We no longer need the messy village of extended family to survive; we can simply hire one.

If our in-law is irritating, we can pay for childcare.
If our mother’s help feels overwhelming, we can hire a postpartum doula.
If a relationship feels complicated, we can opt for convenience.

In this way, affluence enables avoidance. It allows us to curate our social lives around comfort and control rather than tolerance and reciprocity. The more economically independent we become, the less dependent we are on the people who stretch us.

And sometimes, that independence itself is a gift handed down from the very family being rejected. Many of the young adults now severing ties with parents do so after those same parents helped fund their education, co-signed their first lease, or quietly absorbed the cost of early adulthood. The support that made autonomy possible is later reinterpreted as control. Once financial reliance ends, the relationship can be rewritten through the language of freedom: They can’t control me anymore.

It’s a striking irony of privilege—the estrangement enabled by security. When you no longer need your family to survive, you also lose the incentive to work through what makes them difficult. And so, we drift further into what might be called the luxury of disconnection—a life where we can meet nearly all our needs without ever having to practice forgiveness, patience, or repair.

8. So What Do We Do With All This?

It’s easy to feel overwhelmed by all of this, to feel like you’re standing in the tide of something too large to resist. You can’t fight the world. You can’t change a culture on your own. You can’t go to battle against the zeitgeist without burning out in despair.

So here’s what I suggest: When things feel big, focus on the small.

You don’t have to fix the world. What we can do is adapt: by creating small, consistent acts of connection with those closest to us. Reorient to your values and live them out in the relationships right in front of you.

If you’re disheartened by the fact that we live in an individualistic, portable, meritocratic, consumer world, start by noticing where that shows up in your own relationships. Begin to reclaim the village around you.

  • Can you stay in relationship when it’s hard?
  • Can you practice forgiveness even when it isn’t reciprocated?
  • Who are you quick to write off—and who might you reach out to instead?

Nobody changes by being lectured into connection. We learn by observation and osmosis. Culture shifts not through argument, but through example.

So ask yourself:

  • Am I making it easier or harder for people to connect with me?
  • Do people feel seen in my presence?
  • Is there one small thing I can do differently in this relationship today?

That’s how change happens—not through revolution, but through micro-shifts. We don’t have to fix a generation or a cultural moment. We just need to live our values with quiet conviction in a world that spins around us.

Because while you can’t stop the tide, you can build something steady enough to stand in it.

 If this resonated with you, share it with someone who’s also trying to make sense of our disconnected age. The more we talk about it—and live differently inside it—the more repair becomes possible. Also, please consider becoming a paid subscriber, as it allows me to keep offering my articles for free to those in need. Thank you!

Substack.com

Disposable Mothers – An Epidemic

Morning Reflection: This Is an Epidemic

THE DISPOSABLE MOTHER:

A Cultural Indictment of misdiagnosed memories, emotional propaganda and the silencing of the woman who stayed.

There is a quiet war being waged. And the casualty? The Mother. Not the absent one. Not the abusive one. But the one that stayed. The one who broke herself into pieces to keep everything together. The one who gave up her own identity so that her children could find theirs.

The one who fed, clothed, soothed, worked, showed up, and still got labeled toxic.

And what does culture tell her now? Shut up. Don’t complain.

Don’t have needs.

Don’t have feelings.

Don’t be angry.

Don’t be tired.

Don’t be hurt.

Just vanish. Quietly, gracefully and invisibly.

Do this so your Adult Children can finish the story of your failure without you…

There’s a new epidemic.

It’s not viral — it’s emotional.

And its symptoms are silence, shame, and scapegoating.

It’s the epidemic of the disposable mother.

Not the abusive one.

Not the neglectful one.

But the one who stayed.

The one who gave everything — her time, her youth, her identity — and is now being erased from the narrative. Diagnosed without a voice. Abandoned in the name of “healing.” Labeled toxic for having emotions. Forgotten for simply being human.

This isn’t just a few hurt feelings.

This is a widespread cultural phenomenon.

An epidemic of estrangement, misdiagnosed memories, and weaponized therapy.

We are watching an entire generation of mothers be rewritten.

But we will not be erased.

We are still here.

Still grieving.

Still sacred.

Still rising.

Let this post be a gentle wake-up call — a crack in the illusion.

If you are one of these mothers, you are not alone. You are not crazy. You are not toxic.

You are part of a generation of women waking up to a system that betrayed them — and still choosing to hold peace in their hearts.

📖 Read this piece. Share it with someone who needs to know they’re not alone.

Let’s name the wound, and begin the reckoning.

From Sacred Resiliance

The Difficulty of Grieving A Complicated Relationship

By Sam Carr

There is a scene in the pilot episode of HBO’s American black comedy-drama series Succession where Kendall Roy locks himself in the bathroom, no longer able to hold in his rage and resentment towards his father. Billionaire media mogul, Logan Roy, is portrayed as a narcissistic, emotionally abusive, power-hungry father who has inflicted a lifetime of neglect and abuse on his children.

After his mini-breakdown, Kendall composes himself, returns to the dining room, and puts on a brave face with the rest of the family to celebrate his father’s birthday. There is an uncomfortable sense that family life is an artificial performance. Not too far from the surface are the pain, resentment and anger of decades of dysfunctional family life.

Trauma specialist, Caroline Spring, wrote that the “happy family” is a myth for many, a performed cultural ideal that masks a myriad of unpalatable truths. This can also be true in death, as people negotiate the loss of family members they blatantly disliked during life, or who caused them nothing but suffering and pain.

It’s difficult to say how many funerals are characterised by singing the praises of people many of those present either openly or secretly resented or cannot forgive.

It’s not necessarily that the deceased wasn’t loved or that their loss doesn’t still sting. Grieving dysfunctional, toxic or hurtful relationships creates a different level of complexity.

In Succession, when the tyrannical Logan Roy finally dies his children’s sadness is palpable. However, family therapists have argued that such grief can be complicated by the fact that the bereaved are often mourning a relationship they wish they’d had with the deceased or are angry and remorseful about the fact that things were never repaired.

There is also the possibility for internal conflict when cultural or familial pressure to celebrate the deceased collides with an internal need to acknowledge the fact that they were mean, abusive, and neglectful.

Artificial forgiveness

Bereavement psychologists suggest that forgiving the deceased is important to preserving mental health. After all, as Nelson Mandela suggested, resentment “is like drinking poison and waiting for the other person to die”.

In simple terms, psychologist Robert Enright defined forgiveness as rooting out negative thoughts, feelings and behaviours towards someone, and finding a way to develop positive thoughts, feelings and behaviours about them too. He suggested such forgiveness is highly relevant in cases where the offending party is dead.

In his book, Dying Matters, palliative care physician, Ira Byock, argued that suffering can be eased through deathbed rituals designed to foster forgiveness. As part of a “good death”, he encourages people to engage in five steps, where they say:

Forgive me. I forgive you. Thank you. I love you. And Goodbye.

The idea being that such forgiveness rituals help “wipe the slate clean”.

However, it has been argued that this sort of forgiveness is artificial.

Grief psychologist, Lorraine Hedtke, believes such practices pressure people into what she calls an “artificial ending”. Sometimes people end up silencing suffering or minimising and denying pain in service to a cultural pressure to accelerate forgiveness. She also questions whether forgiveness is really something we can conjure up in “once and forever” rituals.

Death is not the end

Of course, death is not the end of our psychological relationship with the deceased. Hedtke offers the example of an abusive, angry, tyrannical father, much like Succession’s Logan Roy, whose six sons had few kind words to say about him on his death.

Neither the man’s death, nor his funeral, she wrote, were the time or place any of his children felt able to make false declarations of forgiveness. At the funeral they had few kind words or fond memories and could not recall appreciative connections with their father. Only in the years that followed did they begin to construct a more forgiving version of him.

Eventually the brothers were able to retain their original reality – that he was indeed a mean and vindictive father – and also begin to appreciate and understand him in a different light too. This was sparked by a random conversation about a long-forgotten fishing trip, prompting them to remember a positive quality that had previously gone unnoticed.

Even after death, Hedtke argues, relationships change and evolve. In some cases, perhaps this sort of change is only possible after someone’s death.

Studies have also suggested that people’s capacity to forgive the dead may be connected to psychological factors like attachment. Psychologists Elizabeth Gassin and Gregory Lengel found that people with high attachment avoidance were less likely to reach forgiveness for someone they were close to who had died. This makes sense because attachment avoidance is a tendency to repress or shut away our feelings for the other. It is difficult to forgive someone if we are unable to acknowledge or face our feelings about them.

So with all this in mind, it might be hard for the Roy children to forgive Logan straight away. Theirs was a fraught and complicated relationship. Their journey to forgiveness and through grief might take time but that is normal.

The Conversation

The Positive Side of Family Estrangement at Christmas

and creating a family ‘of choice’.

Is There A Positive Side to Family Estrangement?

The answer to the above question is a resounding yes. Although, as Annie Wright observes in her article, “Brittle, Broken, Bent: Coping with Family Estrangement,” many consider even approaching the idea that family estrangement can feel good to be against all they believe.

The fact is that family estrangement can mean peace of mind that the survivor hasn’t known their entire life as they become released from the fear and drama that their family of origin has wrought upon them.

There is no doubt that family estrangement is painful, and one needs to grieve, but after a time, it becomes clear that staying away from family means freedom, independence, and safety.

It is far safer for many survivors to remain away from their family of origins because they have been guilted, invalidated, gaslighted, verbally abused, and sometimes risk their physical health being in their presence.

The Best Way to Cope, Finding a Family of Choice

Coping with family estrangement, especially during the holidays, is tough for survivors to face alone. This is why it is vital to find and form a family of choice (FOC). A family of choice offers welcome support to help from people who have your wellbeing at heart.

To be clear, a family of choice need not be a literal family as society sees it. Instead, a FOC can is a group of friends or work acquaintances, anyone who wishes to support you or needs support themselves.

A family of choice doesn’t need to be large; in fact, there are no limitations to the size of a new family. The only requirement is that you gather together as a group of people who have each other’s love and share each other’s burdens. Not only this but at Christmas time, a family of choice will also share the joy the season brings.

Forming a Family of Choice

A family of choice is a group of people who will empower you to build your self-esteem and with whom you can celebrate your life. But how do you create a family of choice? While choosing a different family to spend your time with other than your original may seem overwhelming, doing so can bring the peace of mind and joy you’ve missed all your life.

The easiest way to begin is to look at those around you. Sit down and think about the people in your life who mean the most to you, including friends, acquaintances, work relationships, and associates at your place of worship.

Once you’ve identified who you might include in your family of choice, begin to share your life with them and to show how much you care for them. You might ask the people you have identified to be your family of choice offering your support and love in return.

Be cautious not to overwhelm people or to choose people that echo the terrible behaviors of your family of origin. It would be too easy to fall prey to folks who do not deserve to be your family of choice if you are not careful because survivors, like all humans, tend to go with what they know.

The Advantages of Having a Family of Choice

No matter what, the advantages of having a family of choice when your family of origin is toxic are enormous. Having someone to stand beside you through thick and thin, when you feel lost, or when you are enjoying an accomplishment is incalculable in its value.

There are at least six advantages to having a family of choice, including those listed below.

  • A family of choice will make their relationships with you a high priority and not let you down. They will not make you feel guilty, show you dispassion, or ignore your needs.
  • A family of choice will spend time with you talking about issues both big and small, plus engaging with you so that you feel you have a voice.
  • A family of choice will deliberately seek opportunities to spend time with you. These activities may include shopping and taking a meal together.
  • A family of choice will promote spiritual and emotional wellness. They will believe in you sharing their faith and offer healing actions that show they care. This promotes improved mental health and a chance for spiritual fulfillment as well.
  • A family of choice will appreciate you and show you so whenever you come together with them. They will show you through behaviors, words, and gestures that prove you are worthwhile and that they love being with you.
  • A family of choice is capable of facing times of crisis and stress together coping with difficulties as they happen.

Finding the Positive Side of Family Estrangement by Forming a Family of Choice

Family estrangement is an incredibly painful event to experience alone. By forming a family of choice, you can open your heart and allow someone else to help you conquer the loneliness and disappointment.

Forming a family of choice means allowing others into your life and celebrating their lives with them. It means not being alone during the crisis of family estrangement and trusting someone else to be there for you.

These concepts are challenging for those of us who are survivors and have had horrific experiences with our families of origin. However, to not reach out and form relationships with others, we risk allowing our souls to suffer unimaginable harm that need not happen.

I encourage you to reach out to others around you and share your life with them. Allow them to love you and show you unconditional positive regard and show them your affection freely. After all, a family is a supportive group of people who will lift you up when you are down and celebrate your accomplishments, not necessarily those whose home into which you were born.

We sincerely hope you will include the CPTSD Foundation into your family of choice

“The family is the test of freedom; because the family is the only thing that the free man makes for himself and by himself.” ~ Gilbert K. Chesterton

CPTSD Foundation

Complexity of Grief with Estrangement

by Kaytee Gillies

  • The complexity of grief is difficult to describe or understand, especially when it’s a family member one has been estranged from.
  • We have every right to feel sad, angry, resentful, or even guilty, whether the estrangement was our choice or not.
  • When we lose those we were distanced from, the pain is still there. Yet, many do not understand, so it can feel isolating.

Grieving the loss of a parent from whom you were estranged is a very difficult experience. You have the grief that comes from loss and the permanence of death. Death is a very traumatic experience, and that grief can never be replicated or compared. However, the grief that follows when someone has been estranged from a family member or loved one can sometimes feel worse. It is filled with guiltshame, and a sense of loss—or of grieving what wasn’t there.

With estrangement, there is so much unknown: Some people might struggle with guilt or anger, having wanted a reconciliation, yet they are unable because it is too late. This brings the loss of what could have—and should have— been, coupled with the knowledge of what is unattainable. Many others might struggle with resentment. One client put it perfectly: “I don’t even have the luxury of grieving the loss of my dad because, instead, I’m grieving the loss of who my dad was—and our lack of a healthy relationship.” My client echoed the feelings and sentiments that many others, myself included, have felt.

The questions and judgments from others make it all the more difficult for survivors of estrangement. There are the insensitive and unaware questions or comments such as “But they’re your family; you should have talked to them” or guilt trips such as “Why are you sad? You didn’t talk to them anyway.” To someone who has never been estranged, it’s impossible to understand. To them, it might just seem like a petty argument or disagreement, and they might automatically blame the survivor for their feelings of grief.

Many estrangements are due to traumas, conflict within the family, mental illness, abuse, or other elements that make the relationship difficult—or impossible—to navigate. Too many well-meaning friends will tell you to “just move on,” not knowing that it’s not that simple. Comments like this place the blame for the estrangement on an already vulnerable and often traumatized individual.

Here are five steps to help you navigate the grief experience of losing a parent from whom you were estranged:

Validate and honor your feelings. You have every right to feel sad, angry, resentful, or even guilty. You do not owe anyone an explanation for these feelings, nor do you need permission to feel them. Survivors of family estrangement are often blamed for the estrangement, whether it was your choice or not, and are often made to feel that their feelings aren’t valid with comments such as “Well, you didn’t talk anyway, so it can’t be that hard.”

Negative feelings do not mean you need to act differently. Many survivors feel that negative feelings, specifically guilt, mean we were wrong and that the estrangement was our “fault,” or that there was something we should have done differently. This is not only unfair, but it is also unrealistic. Allow yourself to acknowledge these feelings, but try not to let them gaslight you into thinking your experiences didn’t happen.

Seek support from those who understand. During your grieving process, choose to spend time with those who validate you and your feelings. Whether they are friends, family, support groups, or others who understand, you need people in your corner who are not going to challenge your feelings or make you feel like you have to “prove” your grief, which can make you feel misunderstood and uncomfortable.

Remember that grief is like riding a wave. You will have good days, or even good weeks, when you think you’re all done grieving, only to hear a familiar song or smell a nostalgic smell that brings you right back. Know that this is normal and that it is part of the process.

Seek professional support if needed. Do not be afraid to seek professional support from a therapist. Navigating grief is extremely difficult, especially if there was any sort of dysfunction in the family relationship. Most of my clients have histories of traumatic or dysfunctional families, and the death of a parent or family member does not take that dysfunction away. They still have the unhealthy messages and unhealed traumas to unpack and work through—even more with the addition of grief.

Psychology Today